Take back your offspring

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS CRITICAL TO ALL PARENTS AND IS ALSO SOMETHING LAWYERS WILL NEVER ADMIT TO! IN FACT MOST LAWYERS SUPPORT THE CONCEPT THAT THE STATE OWNS OUR CHILDREN.

By AL Whitney © copyround 2017
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines.net is acknowledged.

---

Many parents are already aware of the “Medical Kidnapping” of children that has been going on for quite awhile in the United States. Others – the compliant ones – are oblivious to this state executed crime.

Since the passage of the Social Security Act in 1935 and the implementation of state issued Birth Certificates, the state has assumed the unconstitutional supreme authority over all children who have a Birth Certificate. The doctrine behind this usurpation of authority is known as Parens Patriae.

Parens patriae definition from legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com:

In the United States, the parens patriae doctrine has had its greatest application in the treatment of children, mentally ill persons, and other individuals who are legally incompetent to manage their affairs. The state is the supreme guardian of all children within its jurisdiction, and state courts have the inherent power to intervene to protect the best interests of children whose welfare is jeopardized by controversies between parents. This inherent power is generally supplemented by legislative acts that define the scope of child protection in a state.

Under most religious law, the children belong to the parents. It is a moral obligation on the part of the parents to care for and educate their children in their existing social values and morals.  However, the Center for Disease Control INC (CDC) has informed its employees that this is not really the case. The following comes from their web site:

Who owns our children?

IF YOU BELIEVE THAT THE STATE HAS A LAWFUL CLAIM TO CONTROL YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR HEALTH CARE  –  READ NO FURTHER.

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

If you believe the constitution is going to protect your children from mandatory school vaccinations, then please review this Federal Judge’s decision.  See Judge tosses out three religious exemption claims

Why are we asking the STATE OF corporation their permission (an exemption) to protect our precious children from unwarranted toxic pharmaceutical products known as vaccines?

Who owns our children?

When a man and woman combine their biological matter together to create a zygote, they are the rightful owners of their creation. Without her biological matter (egg) and his biological matter (sperm) the zygote would not exist. The woman’s body provides the environment necessary for the zygote to grow into maturity. Upon maturity, the woman’s body provides the process necessary for the zygote to join our world as a brand new male or female. The fledgling boy or girl needs many years of nurturing before reaching his/her maturity i.e. ability to care for himself/herself. The man and woman own and are obliged to care for their progeny (property) until their progeny reaches adulthood. The vast majority of male and female progeny reach adulthood as a result of their mother and father’s care and nurturing.

The STATE OF corporation (owning no eggs, sperms or wombs) contributes nothing to this process and therefore cannot make any lawful claims as “Parens Patriae“.

So how is it that they claim to have the authority to force mothers and/or fathers to enter their progeny into public schools (compulsory education) or force them to inject their progeny with toxic unwarranted pharmaceutical products called vaccines? What authority does the STATE OF’s child protective services (CPS) have to steal the mother and father’s property (progeny)? Since the STATE OF didn’t (couldn’t) contribute to the creation of the man and woman’s progeny (boy or girl), where does its ownership claim come from? What does the STATE OF corporation actually own?