Category Archives: vaccine

Vaccine Pushers and Beneficiaries

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

CDC INCThe following is unknown by most health practitioners
and is denied by most attorneys!

FOUR INDISPUTABLE FACTS REGARDING THE VACCINATION PROGRAM:

1) VACCINES CAUSE ILLNESS AND INJURIES AND NEITHER THE PUBLIC NOR HEALTH PRACTITIONERS HAVE BEEN TOLD THE TRUTH BY CDC INC!
In March 2011 an investigation by scientists exposed that the ‘UK government’ had been covering up the harmful effects of vaccines for the past 30 YEARS. Their study, “Health Hazards of Disease Prevention” was presented to the British Society for Ecological Medicine. It exposed that the UK ‘government’ ” . . . made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations from both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence . . .” The same is true in the UNITED STATES.

* More info about the damaging health effects of vaccines at: International Medical Council on Vaccination

2) THE VACCINE INDUSTRY HAS BEEN GIVEN IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUITS
In 1986 vaccine manufactures and administers were given immunity from liability with the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act! And, the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System was established. Annually, it reports about 11,000 serious vaccine reactions, including up to 200 deaths and many more permanent disabilities. But, poor reporting in America suggests that annual adverse vaccine reactions, in fact, number from 100,000 – one million.

Then to ‘seal the deal’, the US Supreme Court decided in 2011 (Bruesewitz v. Wyeth) to grant big pharma immunity from liability even if their products were knowingly contaminated.

Continue reading

Open letter from a grandmother to her daughters regarding vaccines

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

[Originally posted on 3-25-13 on our sister site.]

gardasilFamily,

As you all know, I am madly in love with your children. Their health and their future is of the utmost importance to me. In fact, there is nothing more important to me than their future well being.

That said, we need to talk.

As you all know your father and I have been closely involved in the medical profession for most of our adult lives. During the past 40 years we have observed – from front row seats – many changes in how medicine is practiced.

As a reminder, here is a brief synopsis of your father’s medical career:

  • Was a resident in internal medicine for 18 months
  • Completed a three year residency in anatomic pathology
  • Taught pathology at a medical school in West Virginia for seven years
  • Did a residency in general practice, passed the necessary exam and became a Board Certified physician in Family Medicine
  • Worked for the OSU urgent care clinic system for fourteen years
  • Took many many hours of continuing medical education

And here is mine:
I started my medical career as a hospital billing clerk. Then I was trained at Northwestern University in Chicago in Respiratory Therapy, did an internship-period at the University of Chicago, passed both a written and an oral exam to become a Registered Respiratory Therapist, was a supervisor in a hospital RT dept, and taught both advanced and basic life support to medical students. My last job in the profession was as a secretary for your father.

Your father and I have had many discussions regarding the medical profession over the years, as you know. It is safe to say that both of us were well trained and indoctrinated in the ‘field of medicine’ which has now become an ‘industry’. In fact some brave physicians have gone public regarding the changes that have occurred in the field of medicine over the past several decades: Doctors Speak out: healthcare has been reduced to a money making factory

Continue reading

Be wary of BAR gatekeepers

. . . THEY ARE EVERYWHERE!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

gatekeeper

Following is an analysis of some of the opinions expressed by BAR attorney Alan Phillips on December 22, 2015 in an invitation-only internet vaccination discussion forum with a large membership (over 100 members). Mr. Phillips expressed his opinion as to what topics the members of this discussion forum should be allowed to post and what they should not be allowed to post. Unfortunately the moderator of this discussion forum decided to accept Phillips’ definitions. I was removed for posting a piece exposing that physicians are being called upon to report on patient’s public health status (which would include vaccination history) called Deputizing Doctors

My primary concern is not my removal from the discussion forum, but the extremely important information that is being censored by the influence of  gatekeeper BAR attorney Phillips. By controlling the discussion, Phillips can ensure the elephants in the room are never acknowledged or explored. The physicians, non-profit directors, researchers and journalists in the forum are then kept in the dark as to the vaccination agenda and how it is being executed across the country. Without this knowledge, they will be powerless to help stop it.

Please note: Alan Phillips has claimed to be the leading legal expert in the country regarding vaccines and ‘the law’. Many do not concur with his self assessment. Below are a few of gate keeper Phillips comments followed by my analysis  – which includes bona fide sources.

****************************

 Alliance for Vaccine Awareness [invitation only internet discussion forum]

Disinformation: Critical Scrutiny is Necessary
Posted by Alan Phillips Tuesday at 1:52pm [December 22, 2015]

Excerpts:

There are only 2 legitimate vaccine discussion areas: 1) medical (do they work, are they effective, are they necessary, are there viable alternatives, etc.), and 2) legal (when are they mandatory, do you have the right to refuse, how do we change laws to get those rights, etc.). Issues of corruption, politics, etc. fall under these two headings–the use of false science to control policy and law, our rights.

When we allow our focus to be pulled away from these topics, big pharma pushes forward with its legislative agenda unopposed. WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS THE ROAD IS IN THE STATE LEGISLATURES, as the fed govt lacks authority to mandate vaccines directly. There are definitely fed law issues, but the primary focus must be on the state law level.

But I respectfully request that the owner or manager of this . . . project delete any discussions not pertinent to vaccine medicine and law, . . .


Let’s look at the important issues outside of gatekeeper Phillips’ definitions: vaccine science and state statutory law.

Continue reading

Roadblocks to overcome

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

In the vaccine-aware movement, there seems to be four roadblocks that health advocates have not been able to overcome: government corporations, attorneys, physicians and non-profit organizations. As the vaccine promoters and beneficiaries escalate their efforts, we cannot afford to be ‘politically correct’ nor can we afford to be protective of anyone’s income. Our lives and the lives of our progeny are now at stake!

roadblock - gov inc pngGovernment corporations

What form of government do we really have whereas uneducated legislators can literally be lied to and bribed into cranking out corporate-state statutes and rules that harm our children’s health?

  • Is it representative government – NO
  • Is it government that serves the best interests of the people – NO
  • Is it a network of for-profit corporations [listed on Dun & Bradstreet & using private script – the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE] – YES
  • Do government corporations like the HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF (headquartered in WASHINGTON DC) hold vaccine patents – YES
  • Is it ever to likely serve the best interest of the public? – NO, it is not set up for that purpose, no matter what their employees say.

roadblock - attorneys pngAttorneys

Who writes the corporate statutes that our uneducated legislators pass? Who falsely tells the people that these rules are laws that they are obligated to adhere to? Where are the contracts that the people signed agreeing to adhere to corporate statutes?

  • Do these attorneys represent the best interests of the people, including their clients – NO
  • Do most care that the general population is being harmed and enslaved in this process – NO
  • Since most have a basic understanding of the corporate model, do they investigate and/or expose the fact that the CDC is a for-profit corporation – NO
  • Do any so-called Constitutional attorneys tell the people that today all forms of government are just corporations and our courts are statutory-maritime? – NO [See: 28 U.S. Code § 3002 (15)]
  • Does this commercial-contractual construct called “government” provide income for attorneys? – YES

Continue reading

“Esquire” misinforms thousands of unsuspecting Moms and Dads!

HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION PRESENTS REALLY BAD ADVICE TO IT’S ENTIRE MEMBERSHIP REGARDING VACCINATIONS!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and ParentsAgainstMandatoryVaccines is acknowledged.

[Before reading the following exposé, please read this well written explanation regarding the origin and nature of BAR Esquire attorneys. Hint, they are not what most people think they are. The Legal Craft]

HSLDA logo - questionOn November 10, 2015 BAR Esquire Mike Donnelly of the HOME SCHOOL LEGAL DEFENSE ASSOCIATION (HSLDA) posted an article (Is Government Data Being Used to Deliver drug Company Profits) on their web site regarding letters sent to parents by the Indiana and Michigan health departments. The Michigan form letter was about their statewide vaccination database called the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR). It was addressed to “Parent or Guardian” (a UCC legal term meaning legal fiction “person”).  It was originally personalized with a MCIR ID#, the date of birth, and age of the child. The letter also stated that their child “may be due” for specific vaccines based on MCIR records.  The Michigan dept of Health & Human Services’ letter provided a list of “What you have to do”, which included: 1) make a doctor’s appointment, 2) give the doctor the MCIR notice, and 3) request the doctor’s office update the MCIR vaccination records.  The letter did not contain the word require, nor did it site any state code, rule or regulation.  You don’t have to be BAR Esquire to make these observations.

For many years the HSLDA has sold its unsuspecting membership the notion that this massive Washington, DC based non-profit corporation advocates for moms and dads who wisely choose to home school their sons and daughters. Membership in this non-profit corporation is $120 a year. They claim to have a membership of 84,000, therefore their admitted annual income exceeds $10, 080,00 a year and supports 9 BAR Esquires included in a staff of 100.

Directly from the HSLDA’s Mission Statement

To preserve and advance the fundamental, God-given, constitutional right of parents and others legally responsible for their children to direct their education. We advocate for these freedoms in the courtrooms, before government officials, and in the public arena.

While their mission statement sounds good like all mission statements, it is based on keeping the “constitutional rights” myth alive for the purpose of fleecing the ill informed.

Earlier this year  (July 7) Constitutional and Administrative attorney Jonathon Emord told the truth regarding agency rules and regulations and the US Constitution on a Coast to Coast radio broadcast. Here is a short clip from that interview:

Mr. Emord accurately stated that since the 1930’s administrative agencies have been increasingly dismantling our so-called “Constitutional” rights.  Unfortunately he did not mention the reasons: 1) the well documented permanent state of national emergency (responsible for the creation of the massive administrative arm of our so-called government) which originated in 1933 and 2) the implementation of the Uniform Commercial Code (statutory law) which occurred in the 50’s and 60’s.

While BAR Esquire Donnelly’s article reflected his objection to government data collection efforts being used to promote pharmaceutical products, he totally misinformed HSLDA members. He stated that the letter “ordered parents to make an appointment to have their children immunized”, which it did not.  Donnelly also did not let them know that the letter created no obligation for them to take any action whatsoever. Again it does not contain the word require and absolutely no code, rule or regulation is even sited.

As an advocate for lawful government, here is what I would do with this letter:

trash can. . . and here’s what I would do with my Home School Legal Defense Association membership:cancel Lesson: Never presume that Esquires are experts in the law!

School vaccination exemption lost in California . . . what now?

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

Jerry Brown

Governor Jerry Brown

On June 30, 2015 California’s governor Brown signed SB 277, that was recently passed by both the California House of Representatives and Senate. This new STATE OF CALIFORNIA statute closed the door on non-medical exemptions to state mandated school vaccinations.

There have been many responses to this travesty, unsurprisingly.  The parents who have unquestioningly accepted the falsehoods  spewing out of Big Pharma and the CDC (exposed by a Harvard Study) are relieved for they naively believe this change will serve to protect their own children. Those who understand the reality regarding vaccines are appropriately stunned and frightened.

Proposals to overcome the loss of protective exemptions are varied. Here are the most prevalent so far:

  1. Leave the state
  2. Find a doctor willing to sign a medical exemption
  3. Write your own religious exemption citing the first amendment of the Constitution
  4. Support a referendum: take the vaccine exemption issue to the general public in hopes over overriding the legislative decision
  5. File a lawsuit
  6. Home school your children
  7. Submit a legal notice

Perhaps the vaccine-aware population needs to take a close look at these proposals before they put their time, money or hope into them.

Continue reading

Dr. Andrew Wakefield maliciously defamed by TIME

The following video is polluted with vicious lies and disinformation about vaccines, the CDC and the honorable Dr Andrew Wakefield.

The true story of Dr Wakefield’s exceptional integrity and the vicious destruction of his career was explained by former CDC/EPA employee Dr David Lewis – who did his own thorough investigation of the entire tragic episode and explained his findings on Roger Landry’s show, The Liberty Beacon. Now only did Dr Lewis validate Dr Wakefield’s innocence, he exposed exactly how Wakefield was framed.

Dr David Lewis interview on The Liberty Beacon:

Article regarding Dr David Lewis and his new book //Science for Sale//

So, you’ve signed the Refusal to Vaccinate document?

Refusal to Vaccinate form header - sm 2

By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

 

Perhaps you missed DO NOT SIGN the “Refusal to Vaccinate” Form and unwittingly signed the form!

What to do next?

Start by asking for the original back. Tell the doctor (or whoever) that your “family” decided for many reasons (we came up with 12) that it was not good to have it in your (or your child’s) file. It is best not to offer any more information than that or engage in any discussion, but to remain firm but pleasant. When it comes to vaccines, anything you tell them can be used against you, believe it or not!

The doctors have been warned that if they don’t have this form on file, the parent could sue the doctor should the child get one of the diseases the vaccine was ‘supposed’ to prevent. The lawyers for the vaccine agenda have pitted the doctors against the health and safety of their patients. Sad, huh? We have proof of this because we’ve read the instruction page that accompanied the Refusal to Vaccinate form that was given to physicians, et al.

If the doctor’s office does not cooperate, you will have to send them a certified letter “rescinding your signature” thus nullifying the form. It is also recommended that you send them a Vaccination Notice to end all disputes regarding vaccines.

Here is a sample letter reflecting what I would write:

Dear Doctor Bloohoo,

Unfortunately, I mistakenly signed the Refusal to Vaccinate form regarding my son (or daughter) that your office asked me to sign. After discussion with my family, I have decided that this form was not in our best interest to sign and have placed in my son’s (or daughter’s) file.

I hereby rescind my signature on that form making it null and void and require that your office return the original to me.

I (we) have concluded, after much research, that vaccinations today are neither safe nor effective and that the theory of “herd immunity” has been scientifically proven invalid many times.  So I am sending you my (our) own Vaccination Notice. Please include this notice in my son’s (or daughter’s) medical record.

Appreciatively,

Jane Doe (Mother of Sally Doe)
125 Maple Canyon
Canton, Ohio

Enclosed: Vaccination Notice


The Vaccination Notice with instructions can be found in the Overcoming Vaccine Mania Guide.

Beware of vaccine bullies!

Michelle Malkin, Townhall.comMalkin
2/4/2004

Why on earth should we vaccinate our newborn baby against Hepatitis B — a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use and sexual contact? That is the question my husband and I had for the doctors and nurses at the hospital where our son was born two and a half months ago.

We didn’t get very good answers. It was “convenient,” “recommended” and “routine,” the medical staff assured us. We wanted more information. A nurse gave us a brochure, which explained that babies whose mothers had the Hep B virus were at high risk of developing acute Hep B infections. Well, I tested negative for Hep B. The Centers for Disease Control named unprotected sex, IV drug use and being stuck with a needle on the job as the likeliest routes of Hep B transmission. Well, my husband and I both work primarily from home, our two children stay at home, and neither we nor our 3-year-old daughter nor our baby (for heaven’s sake!) live the Kid Rock-and-Pamela Anderson Lee lifestyle.

When we told the hospital staff that we simply wanted more time to think about giving the Hep B shot to our son — doesn’t “informed consent” mean we should be truly informed? — we were badgered aggressively. Some lectured us about the need to “get on the proper vaccination schedule.” Others warned that Maryland, like more than 40 other states, requires all schoolchildren to be vaccinated for Hep B. Teachers, however, are not subject to the mandate, which is driven not just by altruistic concern for children’s health. Ohio legislator Dale Van Vyven snuck the Hep B mandate into a 1998 hazardous-waste bill at the behest of profit-maximizing vaccine manufacturers’ lobbyists.

Continue reading

“Limited hangout” in vaccine aware movement?

By AL Whitney © copyround 2014
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

As thCDC - NOreat of an ebola false flag campaign looms over our country, we can no longer afford to be politically correct. Nor can we afford to tell half truths. The growing Center for Disease Control (CDC) ebola campaign (which resembles the H1N1 campaign of 2009) could have very serious consequences for the American population. So, we have to understand the extreme importance – right now – of discrediting the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Disclaimer: I have never met or communicated with Barbara Loe Fisher, therefore I have absolutely no personal grudge against either her or her organization, National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). As Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines neither solicits nor accepts donations or grants, we are not in competition with NVIC for funding either.

Limited hangout” is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details; to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when ones own sympathies are privately with them; or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous.”

This is a common tactic used by politicians as well as government intelligence agencies caught in scandals.

NVIC founder, Barbara Loe Fisher’s piece on another CDC whistleblower, Dr Thompson, fits the description of limited hangout . . . perfectly.

Here is the real story as brilliantly and bravely told by Dr Andrew Wakefield:
CDC Whistleblower

Wakefield’s video proves CDC’s awareness of vaccines causing autism as well as a history of the CDC intentionally causing harm and injury.

Here is Barbara Loe Fisher’s limited hangout coverage of the same story:        Remove Vaccine Safety Oversight from DHHS


Barbara accused the CDC of “withholding pertinent information” and having “conflicts of interest”. She doesn’t even mention the whistleblower’s name, so people could search out the details of the real story on their own.  And then, she moves the guilt away from the CDC and onto the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), which was never even mentioned by the whistleblower.  Barbara finishes her message by recommending contacting Congress. How many times will folks repeat the same strategy  expecting different results? In 2007 an investigation conducted by Senator Tom Coburn exposed the fact that the CDC functions exactly like a for-profit corporation: Report – CDC Off Center.  Nothing has changed ergo, contacting Congress simply won’t work, as the CDC is not under Congressional control. In fact, former EPA-CDC whistleblower and author Dr David Lewis exposed in a recent interview that both the EPA and the CDC are under the control of the White House. Short audio clip of that interview

THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST! To call what is going on at the CDC or the DHHS as “conflict of interests” is another example of . . . limited hangout!

Here Barbara describes the role of the DHHS:

barbara loe fisher

The DHHS is not a credible health advocacy organization. Both the DHHS and the CDC are quite the opposite.  They are for-profit corporations listed on Dun and Bradstreet. Their mission is to aggressively promote policies and products to universities, physicians and the media, that can be extremely harmful to human health – as whistleblowers Dr David Lewis and Dr William Thompson have courageously exposed. These faux agencies must be aggressively discredited. The public needs to understand that they are dangerous for-profit corporations that were never intended to protect the public’s health.  Recently independent researchers Alfred Lambremont Webre and Steve Green have exposed the CDC’s connection to the CIA: CDC and CIA – a close and sick relationship. By the way, Fisher lives in Sterling, VIRGINIA just 16 miles from the CIA’s Langley, VIRGINA operation.

NVIC also sent a ‘limited hangout’ propaganda booklet,  Reforming Vaccine Policy & Law – a Guide, to state legislators across America. It was extremely misleading. NVIC did not criticize the false theory of “herd immunity” upon which mandatory vaccination requirements are predicated.  She actually promoted the CDC’s position. Here is a page from that booklet:

herd immunity - NVIC

What the uninformed legislators really needed was to be educated about the CDC’s complete lack of credibility.  NVIC certainly could have sent the legislators information about the extremely long list of corruption that hangs over their institution (corporation) . . . but they did not.

No one should forget that it was Barbara Loe Fisher who helped Big Pharma shed liability for the harm their vaccine products cause by helping to get the  Vaccination Injury Compensation Act passed in 1986.