Category Archives: law

Judge shoots down the vaccination “choice” movement!


By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and  is acknowledged.


Supreme Court SealSenate Bill 277 was passed and signed into ‘law’ by Governor Brown last year. This so-called law prevents parents from opting out of California’s vaccination requirements for children entering public or private schools.  Essentially no child can be enrolled without proof that they have been subjected to a litany of unwarranted pharmaceutical products called vaccines.

Before the passage of SB 277 parents could submit a document or form requesting permission to opt out (get an exemption) with the assurance that this permission would be granted. This process has been relied on by California vaccine-savy parents for many years, allowing them to ignore the fact that the ‘state’ had no authority to force them to have their progeny injected with any substance whatsoever. The privilege (the Judge’s words not mine) of opting out created what is referred to as the vaccine “choice” movement, i.e. the parent could chose to vaccinate or not!

Well, on August 26, 2016 Judge Dana Sabraw of the UNITED STATES SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA filed a motion in the court denying the request of a group of attorneys (on behalf of multiple people and institutions) to stop the implementation of SB 277. The attorneys had sited several reasons to halt the application of SB 277 including ‘Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion’.

Some of us were expecting this response for the very same reasons the Judge cited, the main one being case law that was established by the 1944 Supreme Court decision Prince vs. Massachusetts. Judge Sabraw not only cited the Prince case, he sited two others as well: Jacobson vs the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1905) and Zucht vs. King (1922). None of these three cases has been overturned mainly because the Supremes have refused to hear suits challenging them, which is their prerogative in our current injustice system. In fact, the Rutherford Institute filed a petition to challenge mandatory vaccines in 2011 and the Supremes rejected it.

Here is Judge Sabraw’s official conclusion: Continue reading

The BAR cannot stop forced vaccinations – but we can!

By AL Whitney © copyround 2016
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and  is acknowledged.

While many good men and women have become BAR attorneys, they are limited in what they can and cannot do . . . without losing their BAR cards.  For instance, they cannot admit or acknowledge the following realities:

So, it falls upon the people to seek their own methodology – outside of the BAR box – for refusing vaccination mandates or requirements.  This video explains the reasons we can and MUST break away from BAR restrictions and forge our own strategies.


The Vaccination Notice


Protect your child from Child Protective Services


By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

CPSMore and more stories are coming in from parents across the country regarding the unlawful kidnapping of their children. Parents who wisely refuse to subject their children to the ever growing number of toxic and dangerous vaccines are not the only parents being victimized. Because their so-called ‘agency’ requires that they investigate all complaints – reasonable or not – employees for Children’s Protective Services (CPS) can show up on anyone’s door step. So, all parents need to be prepared to respond defensively.

If you are unaware of the magnitude of this problem, please go to the website of former CPS employee Carlos Morales: As a former CASA volunteer with several years of experience in my own county, I concur with Mr Morales’s observations and conclusions about these dysfunctional and often dangerous so-called “child protection” agencies. You can listen to an interview Mr. Morales did on Red Ice Radio:

All CPS employees are bound by the rules and regulations (codes) of the STATE in which they are employed. So, one of the first things to be understood is why the so-called presumed authority of the STATE OF over our children is not valid – without our consent.

The STATE OF’s vast network of employees and their courts have been told that our son and daughters are indeed their property as in ‘under their jurisdiction’. To enforce their codes, they must provide proof of this claim, if requested. Without asking them for proof of their claim, it is presumed we accept it as fact.  [See Who Owns Our Children] The only so called proof they have is the birth certificate[1] signed by the child’s Mother. However, the Mother was never told that by signing the birth certificate she was donating her baby to the STATE OF. Contracts with undisclosed terms and conditions are not lawful and cannot be enforced . . . without your consent. What do you think the likelihood is of them admitting in writing that your signature on your baby’s birth certificate – that you were coerced into signing – meant that you were willingly with full knowledge and understanding donating your baby to the STATE? And, if you indeed did agree to care for the STATE’s property, as you have been doing, where are your payments for the many hours and costs you have invested?

Continue reading

Who owns our children?


By AL Whitney © copyround 2015
Permission is granted for redistribution if linked to original and Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines is acknowledged.

If you believe the constitution is going to protect your children from mandatory school vaccinations, then please review this Federal Judge’s decision.  See Judge tosses out three religious exemption claims

familyWhy are we asking the STATE OF corporation their permission (an exemption) to protect our precious children from unwarranted toxic pharmaceutical products known as vaccines?

Who owns our children?

When a man and woman combine their biological matter together to create a zygote, they are the rightful owners of their creation. Without her biological matter (egg) and his biological matter (sperm) the zygote would not exist. The woman’s body provides the environment necessary for the zygote to grow into maturity. Upon maturity, the woman’s body provides the process necessary for the zygote to join our world as a brand new male or female. The fledgling boy or girl needs many years of nurturing before reaching his/her maturity i.e. ability to care for himself/herself. The man and woman own and are obliged to care for their progeny (property) until their progeny reaches adulthood. The vast majority of male and female progeny reach adulthood as a result of their mother and father’s care and nurturing.

The STATE OF corporation (owning no eggs, sperms or wombs) contributes nothing to this process and therefore cannot make any lawful claims as “Parens Patriae“.

So how is it that they claim to have the authority to force mothers and/or fathers to enter their progeny into public schools (compulsory education) or force them to inject their progeny with toxic unwarranted pharmaceutical products called vaccines? What authority does the STATE OF’s child protective services (CPS) have to steal the mother and father’s property (progeny)? Since the STATE OF didn’t (couldn’t) contribute to the creation of the man and woman’s progeny (boy or girl), where does its ownership claim come from? What does the STATE OF corporation actually own?

Continue reading